• http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1695668.ece
    *
    Women cyclists are far more likely to be killed by a lorry because, unlike men, they tend to obey red lights and wait at junctions in the driver’s blind spot, according to a study.*

    This is NOT what the study said at all. That is speculation by the journalist.

    Here are the actual stats:

    *from 1999 - May 2004:
    87 deaths of cyclists of which 21 were female, 66 male.

    Of those 21 females an astonishing 18 (85%) were killed by HGV drivers.

    Another 28 of the males (around 50%) were also killed by HGVs.*

    http://www.movingtargetzine.com/article/chinese-whispers-female-cyclists-killed-by-hgvlgvs-in-london-1999-2004

    *No conclusions were, or could be, drawn regarding whether or not red light jumping contributed or otherwise to the numbers of cyclists killed. There was no survey of the number of cyclists jumping red lights, broken down by sex attached to the report. In some of the cases there was consideration of the circumstances, but not all, because some of the files relating to the cases were not available to the LRSU researcher. Therefore all of the media comment yesterday was just that: comment.

    I recall that at the time we were shown the report, members of the group speculated as to why females, and someone, possibly me, possibly someone else, speculated that it was because female cyclists tend to be more submissive on the road, and generally more law-abiding. And it’s possible that someone, again, possibly me, would have mentioned that Seb would probably still be alive today if he had NOT stopped at the red light alongside Terence Fallow’s tipper truck. But again, the speculation was just that: speculation.*

    http://www.movingtargetzine.com/article/red-lights-and-media-spin

About