• Hi Sparky, sorry to contradict but I would actually.
    In this case I've made no reference to the writer being anything as my rant is directed at more than just his article and it would be shortsighted for me to infer anything about him without listing the writer of all of the other pieces, something I have neither the time or inclination to do. so it's a mute point

    However, that said, I see no reason that I wouldn't insult someone face to face based on an actual discussion of a topic. It's not the most intelligent way of dealing with an argument, as per the expample below.

    Person A; I believe that SO & So is true
    Person B; You are so wrong you cunt
    Person A; I hate you

    But it's more likely that in a face to face conversation that I would call someone a "narrow minded fool" if they didn't at least try to view things from the point of view of the other side of the argument. Obviously this would involve me also having attempted the same.

About

Avatar for Object @Object started