-
Aha! We have a fundamental difference in our understanding of what constitutes common and proper nouns. I'm going with this version, so we'll have to agree to disagree.
Bible vs bible is a nice example of how metaphorical use of proper nouns can make them common nouns though.
It started in uppercase as 'this is the Bible of this' because it once had direct reference to the actual Bible (proper noun) but, through a lot of usage, it became a common metaphorical phrase and is now 'the bible of xyz' (common noun) when used transitively.
So, did you go? :)
Not yet. Nerd Nite doesn't appear to be happening atm. If anyone knows of a grammar geeks' gathering, I'm there! :)
Sorry, I missed this.
No, please do.
Yes, as I said. See above.
Indeed.
I'm not sure I understand in what way this is meant to be an argument. Plenty of names and specific nouns are capitalised in English. This is often to clarify different usages of the same word, e.g. 'the Bible' or 'the bible of the XYZ movement'. Part of the misunderstanding here seems to be the assumption on your part that just because something doesn't 'need' something, it shouldn't have it? I don't think I can really work out what you meant to mean, though.
Where did I correct you? I said: 'It should always be ...' and that continues to be my view. A correction would be: 'It is always ...' or just the correct word/spelling/whatever.
It's actually a good case in point and very similar. I would here likewise capitalise 'Alpha male' and consider that better than lowercase.
So, did you go? :)