I agree with you, but the point I'm trying to make is some people's homes are being taken away even when the people being removed have rights.
These rioters in social housing have a security of tenure and low cost far beyond many others, so why does this privilege not require not being exceptionally antisocial.
Maybe this discussion is better face to face. Maybe I'm jaded.
I agree with you, but the point I'm trying to make is some people's homes are being taken away even when the people being removed have rights.
These rioters in social housing have a security of tenure and low cost far beyond many others, so why does this privilege not require not being exceptionally antisocial.
Maybe this discussion is better face to face. Maybe I'm jaded.