-
• #6877
Citation needed....
-
• #6878
The references to Rayner and the council house sale is a bit tedious - how many houses did Hint forget he had/forget to declare?
-
• #6879
The non-dom replacement thing will end up with greater tax relief for those carefully selected to qualify, I'm sure.
-
• #6880
SNP has forced a vote on something, but nobody knows what?
-
• #6881
Drop in CGT on residential property - Jeremy selling more of the houses and flats he doesn't remember owning?
-
• #6882
Starmer good with “the Chuckle Brothers of decline”
-
• #6883
A tax break for landlords, what the actual fuck
-
• #6884
Quite. Maybe also trying to accelerate small landlords selling off their stock to big landlords.
Whatever the motivation. Cunts all round.
-
• #6885
There are are an infinite number of policies better suited to make landlords sell up, but christ alive that is not the one. Cunts indeed!
-
• #6886
Hunt does have 7 flats he rents out, gotta look after himself
-
• #6887
"Nominal" they said. It was fifteen bleeding grand:
NEW: Michelle Donelan's department paid £15,000 on her behalf to an
academic she wrongly accused over having sympathy for Hamas, new
statement says.https://twitter.com/peterwalker99/status/1765428132377509967
-
• #6889
Shocked
Not
Lying Cnut rightly called out at PMQ’s by Starmer right off the bat -
• #6890
Actually there is no current Prime Minister, we have to suffer some stand-in sock puppet in the driverless seat
Hardly surprising it mouth-jerks lies depending on which extremist bully or hedge fucker or cum-donator yanks the chain -
• #6891
Same lie Raab used a few years back
They haven’t even any new ideas for misleading Parliament
-
• #6892
I guess I was looking for something beyond immediate self-enrichment for that policy. Maybe it’s just that.
-
• #6894
Oh no, I’m sure they tell themselves something like that!
-
• #6895
That was the false “aha” moment I referred to earlier.
Who knew that an anagram of Rishi Sunak was Shameless Lying Shit
-
• #6896
Over the last few years, the Government has been steadily reducing the
annual tax free amount of gains an individual can realise before CGT
kicks in. In 2022/23 it was £12,000, today it is £6,000, from April it
will drop to £3,000. This means that a landlord disposing of property
and realising a gain will still likely pay more tax at 24 per cent
than they would have two years ago even with the CGT rate at 28 per
cent. -
• #6897
Thanks for posting this. Isn't this designed to shore up the current state of the market by keeping small landlords in the game?After all, why sell a property if you can't realise a windfall?
-
• #6898
Biased source is biased…
The two different rates (today/from April) have an intersection point at a gain of 42k. So for anyone with a larger gain they'll pay less tax.
The majority of landlords in England have been landlords for over a decade (source: English Private Landlord Survey 2021), so it's likely that the majority of landlords will pay slightly less, and more recent landlords paying slightly more.
Average gain in London in 10 years (source): £508,037 (in 2024) - £355,830 (in 2014) = £152,207
Average gain in the UK in 10 years (source): £302,164 (in 2024) - £188,265 (in 2014) = £149,957These cunts deserve no tax breaks whatsoever, and I would be well happy if capital gains was set to 100% for second homes.
1 Attachment
-
• #6899
Is the c word necessary here?
-
• #6900
For landlords and tories? yes.
Enjoying the coverage on BBC, they are trying to fact check statements in real time and calling out the all the endless bullshit, need all the media to start doing more of that