You are reading a single comment by @Kimmo and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • As for separating the person from their work or not, it doesn't seem like a great move to me, to just throw out the baby with the bathwater. If the work doesn't explicitly depend on violence of some kind, I think it's fucking nuts, particularly if it's on the strength of unproven allegations. Anyone got any Picasso prints, Kevin Spacey DVDs, etc?

    Are you really saying that what has come out about Spacey or Picasso does not stop you from enjoying their work?

    I’m pretty sure this is not a normal situation, it’s certainly not how I operate. How do you possibly separate what these people have done from their ‘art’ form? I can’t imagine looking at/watching/listening to something that someone has made and not immediately and involuntarily making the link to their actions.

  • Are you really saying that what has come out about Spacey or Picasso does not stop you from enjoying their work?

    I’m pretty sure this is not a normal situation, it’s certainly not how I operate. How do you possibly separate what these people have done from their ‘art’ form? I can’t imagine looking at/watching/listening to something that someone has made and not immediately and involuntarily making the link to their actions.

    I wouldn't say it doesn't introduce a bum note, and certainly I agree that the legacy of someone like Picasso is right to be questioned ala Hannah Gadsby, but on the other hand I think we can separate the art from the person to some extent.

    Consider Spacey - all his work was a collaboration with a great many others; should all that be thrown in the bin? It's easier to argue that he shouldn't be offered any more work, but some might even make a case against that point given he hasn't been found guilty.

    I think this issue is an open question, and I'm wary of those who say there's only one right answer.

About

Avatar for Kimmo @Kimmo started