-
I agree, I think I prefer the dial and hands on the Nivada. The PRX automatics have a pseudo-clous de Paris texture but instead of being machined it's stamped and comes out looking quite soft. I think that makes it look a bit cheap. The "1853" also does look a bit naff.
The PRX is a lot nicer than pretty much any other Tissot I've seen though.
-
PRX is just over £600ish (I think), The Nivada is over £900, a little harsh comparison. (maybe I'm sensitive owning one- hurumph)
I'm with @Howard
The bracelet on the Nivada looks naff
I get what you mean. I'm not particularly bothered by the homage aspect. I just prefer the dial on the Nivada. For some reason i find the dial on the PRX to look a bit cheap. I don't know if its the super thin indicies paired with the structured dial, or the type. At as whole and at a glance i like it but there's something off about it. Never been hugely impressed by Tissot.