-
• #74777
Nice car though.
-
• #74778
let's not get into it
-
• #74779
I love vintage cars, I do not love their emissions. I really don't get the logic behind the ULEZ compliancy for old enough cars.
-
• #74780
Same. Vintage cars (including that merc) are ace but fuck anyone who wants to skirt ULEZ by driving a vintage car.
-
• #74781
40+ yrs old cars are probably not used as daily commuting cars so not killing babies every day.
-
• #74782
Just weekends.
-
• #74783
Classic cars are a great way to avoid ULEZ and mot and road taxđź‘Ť and to run over just stop oil types who block roads and throw powder and custard over stuff
-
• #74784
My neighbour still dailies an 80s merc. I just try to not be outside when he fires it up, lol.
-
• #74785
Better to confine the emissions to third world cobalt and lithium mines eh ;) ;)
-
• #74786
avoid ULEZ and mot and road tax
I mean isn't this basically tax breaks for car nerds to keep cool cars which society* has deemed worthy of survival in existence.
Surely not linking all car costs - ULEZ, tax, speeding fines, whatever - to some sort of wealth X income grading is the same thing? I mean why should some people be able to easily afford to polute while others can't?
*albeit small part of
-
• #74787
Speeding fines are linked to income these days, I believe.
-
• #74788
Not sure I understand but you need to be pretty well off to buy an electric car , pay for it to charge and pollute the environment with huge production lines, loads of plastic and massive batteries that can’t be easily disposed of…
Why not keep using something if it still works? -
• #74789
Two stroke scooter pass a ulez test...
-
• #74790
I suspect the exemption is based on the premise that a 40 year old car is going to spend most of it's life in the garage rather than be used every day of the week, and whilst the emissions from the vehicle are going to be local, the total emissions for a vehicle are massively front loaded, so the manufacture of the car is going to do more environmental damage than driving it around for 200,000 miles or so. There's an argument for running old cars for longer rather than buying a new one that can be made there.
-
• #74791
Local emissions are not going to be great, that said - you can run a modern Bentley engine on the emissions of an old one, apparently.
-
• #74792
Yeah I think you've missed my point, but to yours - you've neatly explained the argument for buying a 2010 kia Ceed vs a tesla, not the argument for driving an inefficient poluting car.
-
• #74793
Real nice. But that doesn't make up for being a dickhead.
-
• #74794
It won't be. It will be ULEZ exempt. Different thing.
-
• #74795
I bet you're fun at parties.
-
• #74796
Fair enough.
It should absolutely never be ULEZ exempt and anyone who buys a vintage car to avoid paying ULEZ is a cunt.
-
• #74797
anyone who buys a car is a cunt.
Yolo
-
• #74798
It should absolutely never be ULEZ exempt and anyone who buys a vintage car to avoid paying ULEZ is a cunt.
Do people do this? They are bonkers if so.
The vintage exception for ULEZ is a total joke though. Terrible, terrible optics.
-
• #74799
So car insurance. Any tricks to not being fleeced? Three years NCB and they still want ÂŁ800 year for me and fam on the comparatively weedy 1.2tsi octavia.
-
• #74800
Get your mileage right. Some people just say 10,000 a year and may not come close. Some insurers have mileage bandings too, so 9,900 miles per year may be cheaper than 10,000.
Adding another low risk named driver might bring it down too.
Not really each to their own if you're inflicting the emissions on other people...