In the news

She was being... impartial...?

Edit: have just read the article, and I've no idea why she had to throw her tuppence in.

Stanley Johnson has a right to reply for fairness and impartiality and any statement with justification or additional context was not really needed especially from her.

Yeah, none of it was her fault, it was just a twitter storm blood tofu eaters.

I didn't watch what she originally said, but assumed when I read the comment that it was a sarcastic dig Stanley Johnson to hammer the assault home to the audience.

So odd that she'd have actually said it as a genuine point.