-
There's some weird left wing birther-style conspiracy that he was actually called Keith and had it changed when he was young but he didn't.
Well, that's news to me. Maybe there are eight people out there think that, but the left tweeters I follow all say it comes from the autocorrect.
I agree it's childish, but it's hardly likely to derail his electoral prospects, is it? Does any undecided voter out there think: "Well, I was considering voting Labour, but some people on Twitter call the leader 'Keith', so perhaps I won't bother?"
It's not actually this, literally
It's the attitude that stinks. What does this even mean?
He's not and never has been called Keith. There's some weird left wing birther-style conspiracy that he was actually called Keith and had it changed when he was young but he didn't.
I share your disappointment that he's not better than he is. FWIW I think there are a few people within Labour who would make better leaders. But the calling him Keith thing is just childish.