-
But a photo of a coffee shop???
a worthless NFTyou're missing the point. there is utility in these JPEGs. For example, you own one, you unlock membership/loyalty discounts and so forth. There are many worthless JPEGs , but there are also ones with utility.
ObiWomKenobi-
I mean I could say no offence but they sound worth as much as brewdog shares 😅
-
Apologies if I caused any offence. I didn’t mean to, and definitely was writing without any consideration or tact.
I’d get involved creating some nfts given the chance. I’ll mop floors if someone’s paying.
Agreed NTFs CAN be useful tokens. I’d say for the most part they are not though.
And justifying the price of an ape? That’s exactly my point. I cannot justify that being worth more than a few hundred pounds as an original artwork and I feel I’m being generous.
That’s why I don’t get it.
That’s why I’m irrelevant
konastab01
George_Sportif
I guess this was in response to the photos of coffee shops? For what, like $300? This is exactly what’s getting me. How the *#$¥ is $300 for a non fungible jpeg of a €^%>ing coffee shop an attractive offer?
Could you imagine someone in the real world trying to sell you the same thing for the same price? It’s just laughable.
Greed/Hype/Supreme/1% club I completely agree is probably the case with the apes and stuff. I can understand this a bit more with regards sheer ego boosting. But a photo of a coffee shop???