You are reading a single comment by @Mr_Smyth and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Probably our department of health or similar at the time during questions session in press briefings.
Id say 8-36 month would fall under protection against future infection that can be considered to be pretty good. So dont even consider it all that much of a wrong even in hindsight esp since they likely thought this pandemic wouldent last this long at that point in time at least not with the continued severity.
badboybjorn
@Mr_Smyth
“Esp since we were first told it protected against future infections pretty well ”
who told you that? its well known that the other 4 circulating coronavirus’s /influenza’s/rhinovirus all have 8-36 month reinfection cycles (not always symptomatic)