You are reading a single comment by @Nahguavkire and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • That's what Mike Dawes uses. It's a great indication of how the perfect 3+3 headstock design, to get straight string paths, is inevitably ugly.

  • It really is isn't it... 6-in-line makes for a far prettier headstock or else just live with the string paths like literally every single guitar player has successfully done for the last century...

    I am surprised some nerds haven't used Steinberger tuners or extended tuner shafts on an aesthetically pleasing bigger headstock to get the same effect... I've yet to see it anyway?

  • extended tuner shafts on an aesthetically pleasing bigger headstock

    You could, but then you’d have function following form in a visually jarring way, with extra material for the longer tuner shafts and surplus wood bulking out the headstock. I know lots of parts of an electric guitar are driven by aesthetics, but for most of it you can at least make an argument about functionality.

About

Avatar for Nahguavkire @Nahguavkire started