• So this frame has been hanging around for a while now it was on the Gillott Facebook page and on Ebay but went unsold.
    Why?

    1. Well for one it was expensive.
    2. All the paint had been stripped off. Suggesting damage or repairs.
    3. The forks were oval to round (unusual for a bike with horizontal rear dropouts), coupled with this. was the fact that, there was no frame number in evidence on the steerer.
    4. There were stories that the original owner had crashed it. (His name is printed on the rear dropouts). The frame came with lots of paperwork, magazine cutouts and race cards from the days of yore, but nothing specific, linking the bike with the paperwork or the cyclist.
    5. The front nearside dropout had a crack in it.

    Erh..! apart from that a great bike.!
    I spoke to the eBay seller and told him there was a crack in the dropout, as it wasnt mentioned in the description.
    He discontinued the auction and I would have left it at that, however inspired by a frame I had bought for a friend recently, which also had oval to round forks on a track/path frame and matching frame numbers I bought the Gillott.

    A.S Gillott Spearpoint 946171
    So built in 1946 and the 171st frame made by them since they opened in 1945

  • Urgh I love that bike. I saw the auction, watched it, looked again and it was gone.

    Round forks was just a preference. I have a ~1960 Mercian Superlight (drilled for both brakes, track ends, round forks) and was looking at the catalogue currently listed on Ebay yesterday: oval or round forks as preferred.

    Don’t round forks give greater lateral stiffness? Important when you’re pumping your guns and tossing the handlebars from side to side. [Which I’m often doing.] So common on track bikes but could easily be chosen for a path frame? And they look 👌

About

Avatar for veloham @veloham started