-
The others options were say she read it and agreed it was a good deal for fishing - incompetent
Read it, disagreed with it but voted for it - incompetent
Read it, didn't agree with it, voted against it - would of been sacked by bossSo saying you didnt have time to read it as was doing something family and religious is a great option as aligns with party values and appears you have full faith in your boss to of done a good job
It is a disgrace she can say it out allowed and keep her job
-
Johnson values loyalty over competence, probably because on some level he recognises his own lack of competence and feels vulnerable. Trump is similar.
Cameron was similar but seemed to more come from the aspect that this is all a bit of a game for him and his chums.
Blair on the other hand was vicious with his sackings and didn't seem to worry how his underlings failings reflected on him. He just moved them on.
Why does tory leadership stand and defend the undefinable these days? E.g. Williamson, that MP who didnt read Brexit bill because she was organising nativity.
Is it because there is no1 else that will take their places?