You are reading a single comment by @Brommers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • From the reporting I read she'd not yet technically been discharged when she went on the march, so still potentially subject to military justice, court-martial, etc.

  • I'd say one would be a persistent pattern of behaviour following her earlier reprimand, i.e. attending another dubious protest while still on active duty, prior to actually leaving the military, probably effectively ignoring the reprimand. I can't see that going down too well in the army.

  • Correct, but still technically on active duty when on the march.

About

Avatar for Brommers @Brommers started