-
• #13027
She put out a press release that finished with the hashtag #krakenonsteroids
The Q crowd are in an unhappy place
-
• #13028
Doesn’t seem that trump has any credible evidence for a legal challenge to the election. Perhaps more crucially, he no longer seems to have the political clout to manoeuvre the repubs or sway the courts, unlike the Bushes in 2000.
The aces I can see up his sleeve now are bartering presidential pardons in exchange for political support to 1) cling to power, or increasingly likely 2) avoid legal troubles come January. It’s possible he could secure a pardon from Biden, as the dems won’t pick up rifles if trump is pardoned, unlike some Q fools who might try it if trump is jailed.
He’ll probably try to pardon himself if Biden refuses, as he’d have nothing to lose and he’d stand a fighting chance in court.
-
• #13029
if he gets convicted in the next 4 years will that stop him from standing again
-
• #13030
I wonder if his game isn't to get as much donations as possible from his voters, then give up all legal proceedings whilst claiming the system is rigged
-
• #13031
Sadly I think it's unlikely - his lawyers will attempt to gum up the whole system as much as possible. It'll be a war of attrition.
-
• #13032
It does seem he’s fleecing his supporters, same as he’s fleeced investors all his life. Little, if any, of his donations are going towards the election lawsuits.
Might be time for him to look into the Siberian real estate market. I hear it’s getting miserable this time of year.
-
• #13033
The President can only pardon those convicted of federal crimes. I don’t believe he can grant immunity in advance of conviction either, so he cannot protect himself from future cases or from state prosecutions, which covers a lot of fraud statute.
-
• #13034
Presidential pardons only cover Federal crimes.
The SDNY, Southern District of New York, prosecuting him for State crimes,
racketeering, tax avoidance, Insurance fraud, etc.,
will eventually find the evidence against at least one member of the Trump family. -
• #13035
I agree but I think he’ll take his chance in court if he’s not pardoned.
Legally it’s not very convincing, but thinking politically, is it likely the powers that be (including Biden) wouldn’t want to lock up a former president? Every single bitter election prior to this, the winner has always gone on about national healing and moving on. My guess is they’d think jailing trump would weaken the office of the Prez, weaken the US, set a bad precedent for the establishment, etc., so they’d oppose trump in court, and eventually the SCOTUS would say something like ‘In principle a president can’t do this, but since this is the first time and there are xyz list of unique factors to consider, we’ll let trump off the hook, but don’t anyone try it again’.
As for the state charges, I’m looking forward to seeing what happens with those.
-
• #13036
Can't verify the number, but this'll be interesting
https://twitter.com/ReportsDaNews/status/1330217550786011139?s=20
-
• #13037
Wasn't Nixon was pardoned for any crimes that he might have committed?
-
• #13038
The Young Turks. I remember thinking were good in the beginning, then they got a bit radical at one point and I stopped following them.
Found this from NPR by googling ‘Letitia James trump’. Article quotes Biden’s reluctance to prosecute former POTUS
https://text.npr.org/937044524 -
• #13039
Correct. But only during his tenure as POTUS
-
• #13040
There's the other argument (can't find the source right now) that if Trump's people can spread enough doubt about the veracity of the election result there is (supposedly) a provision where a president is appointed rather than elected. If so, their game isn't so much to win in court as to sow enough doubt among ordinary republicans to make them write to their congressmen/senators (can't remember which) demanding they disregard the electoral college and go for an appointment instead. They should have the numbers in their favour if they can pull it off.
EDIT: I would be more than happy to be proven wrong though.
-
• #13041
These are the contingencies re: the electoral college
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College#Contingencies
I don't see a scenario where the House would get involved.
-
• #13042
write
There's yer problem
-
• #13043
Can you imagine the scenes if they even try that?
-
• #13044
Epic fail >>>>>>>
"The lawyer leading Donald Trump’s legal efforts in Wisconsin could have his own ballot tossed out if judges accept his widely disputed definition of illegal voting.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has the story:
Jim Troupis, a former Dane County judge and Cross Plains attorney who is representing the Trump campaign, would not answer questions about why he and his wife voted that way.
Troupis and his wife voted early using the state’s in-person absentee option — one of a group of voters whose ballots the Trump campaign has asked election officials to deem illegal.
Their names appeared on exhibits Troupis submitted to the Dane County Board of Canvassers on Sunday, during the county’s third day of retallying ballots. The exhibits include lists of voters who voted in a manner the campaign alleges is illegal, an argument the Board of Canvassers has rejected. The information was provided by Dane County to both campaigns."
-
• #13045
It’s done. “Apprently” Biden won
-
• #13046
Emily Murphy, who heads the GSA, said she made the determination based on “the law” and “facts.”
“Please know that I came to my decision independently, based on the law and available facts. I was never directly or indirectly pressured by any executive branch official including those who work at the White House or GSA with regard to the substance or timing of my decision,” Murphy wrote in a letter to Biden.
When the BLM movement protested that much they fired tear gas at them.
Fuck her sky high. Small minded petty no account anti-democratic waste of oxygen.
-
• #13047
this tacit recognition of biden's win is just the GOP donor dollars talking, surely? His bullshit is starting to cost them, and that will never stand.
anyway. Doubt trump will ever formally concede - not doing so is the only thing allowing him to live rent free in what passes for the minds (and pockets) of his slack jawed cultists. setting yourself and your family of fuckwits up in a country with no extradition treaty probably costs a few notes.
-
• #13048
Finally
-
• #13049
$120m book deal lined up should keep his debtors at arms length for a while or at a minimum allow him to restructure those loans.
-
• #13050
What’s it going to be? A colouring in book?
Don't worry, I checked Twitter and this is actually a BIG move to unleash Sid.