You are reading a single comment by @Crispin_Glover and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
He has zero basis to stop the count.
But he has legal recourse to contest swathes of ballots for lots of different and spurious reasons:
- Faint postmark
- Arrived after polls closed (even if posted before)
- Signatures on slips being too faint
blah blah blah
All of them should be thrown out by a solid system but this is America so ... shrug
- Faint postmark
What moral or legal basis does he have for stopping the count? Obviously it's none, but amazing that he got the neck to try his luck