-
• #15877
Didn't there used to be a bunch of saddos off here doing London based mtb rides?
-
• #15878
Those guys are dicks
-
• #15879
A slack heavy 140mm bike does suck a bit for ride outs but a lighter more distance oriented 120mm bike is surprisingly good.
-
• #15880
A slack heavy 140mm bike does suck a bit for ride outs
Can confirm
-
• #15881
The handling can be fine but you'd probably want to avoid anything with less than a 69° head angle, and obviously you'd need to compensate for the reach of the bars, and there's a lot of time there spent looking a geometry charts.
Drop bar droppers are a thing! Pro make a lever so you can actuate it in the drops.
Drop bar hydraulic brifters!
Yeah, they're pretty ugly bar that headshok equipped on in the Cannondale thread.
I've spent quite a while looking at, and very nearly bought a SL2SS to do this to, but I've already got two cross bikes and I don't need another. There's a lot of faffing and ultimately what it is it achieving? It's taking a fun bike and making it less fun.
-
• #15882
You're far too sensible.
-
• #15884
Hah. The 2014-2017 Cannondale bikes, while not engaging in the head tube angle arms race, certainly pedalled well.
-
• #15885
yeah, my exceed is 100mm.
-
• #15886
Before kiddo came along I was happily doing 70-80 mile rides on my Habit, a 130/120 bike with a 67.5 deg HA. Was good - you could pedal it out to the hills, get a bit rad then pedal home without feeling like you’ve lugged around more than you had to.
-
• #15887
You all need an NS Synonym.
-
• #15889
I'd avoid a mtb with sram, I feel shimano is a lot better. But that is my opinion and not fact.
That SC is quite slack, with 67ht. I also would not want an aluminium mtb.
I would also think about a full sus XC bike. So 120mm front, 100mm rear. A HT is good, but I think full sus more versatile. I do with I had rear travel sometimes.
Perhaps something 2nd hand.
-
• #15891
Out of curiosity, why would you rule out an Aluminium mtb? I assume you are all in on carbon?
-
• #15892
There is a bit of truth in that 'steel is real' stuff. I think I'd find full suspension annoying if I had to travel particularly far to get to anything worth riding.
If you've not got much interesting riding nearby then going for a less capable bike can make it a lot more fun.
-
• #15893
Scott Spark in non RC is the way.
-
• #15894
Any opinions on the Santa Cruz Chameleon?
Yeah it's banging. You are paying a premium for it though. But if you accept that it's a great frame.
-
• #15895
No. Accidental coincidence, whatever I said.
-
• #15896
Carbon is superior in nearly every way, except for cost.
@umop3pisdn that's what lockout is for.
-
• #15897
That looks real good!
I went with http://www.carbonda.com/mountain/full-suspension/98.html.
-
• #15898
Got any pics of the build? Assuming you are running it 29.
-
• #15899
It hasn't arrived yet. Delivery scheduled for today. I still need to get the shock mount gear and swap the air shaft in my Reba to increase it to 120mm.
-
• #15900
Intriguing. Thinking about morphing my 27.5+ Sentier into something a bit more XC oriented, even pedalling three miles to Leigh Woods is a real drag on it.
From west wickham you can pick up bridleways.
It ain't much, but something.
Tbh if riding from your house, a cross or hipster gravel bike would probebrly be better. If going to the hills then mtb will be more fun.