You are reading a single comment by @aglet and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
By general speed I meant that by and large it seems quicker than the 520; more responsive to button presses and nippier showing maps etc. Re solidity the frame of the gadget seems solid enough, just the buttons feel a bit plasticky. Like a cheap digital watch, I suppose the plastic is just a pusher on top of the real button underneath which I hope is awesomely robust and durable.
The firmware still has annoying quirks; I can’t work out how to make it stop showing me (the same) tips about saving battery life etc.
aglet
gdkhgd
Hmmmm, that's a shame that it doesn't seem as solid as the 520. I might hold out a while and wait for more reviews. Who knows, maybe the price will come down a fraction too... But overall I still think it's a better option than the Wahoo for the base maps. What's general speed?