You are reading a single comment by @christianSpaceman and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
You're going to have to 'appease' one side or the other; from a purely practical point of view why not try to appease the smaller, and shrinking, side. You could even try to help them out a bit, because you'd have more resources and economic strength to do so.
christianSpaceman-
Because the system is currently controlled by elitist capitalists that despise humanity with fiscal policy and administration of the system is designed to protect their interests. The economic strength has existed, so there is an inherent problem with gov't and who controls it.
Brexit weakens economic strength in any scenario and the two core problems remain
- a dysfunctional system of gov't controlled by a shadowy elite that serves their interests and marginalises by region and social strata
- a massively imbalanced economic structure that has created an incredibly fragile position in terms of national security (non-militaristic) and sustainability (financially, economic activity, exportable value)
- a dysfunctional system of gov't controlled by a shadowy elite that serves their interests and marginalises by region and social strata
welpeur
How would we then appease the majority that voted to leave the EU. Presumably we'd have to?
The survey thing...yeah I get it but ~17 million voted at the ballot to remain so why are we excited about 1M in an online survey?