-
• #1727
nah, just shoot HP5, eyeball & overexpose. In doubt, push by 1 stop.
-
• #1728
Edgy
-
• #1729
ikr, has a dual range summicron
-
• #1730
With the close focus attachment?
I used to have an M2 with Voigtlander 50 1.5 and 35 2.5 but film development just got a bit too much hassle. Still miss it though.
-
• #1731
With the close focus attachment?
yeah
-
• #1732
Fancy, mine is the one later than that I think, 1969-1979
Doesn't have any dual focus magic -
• #1733
Deep into 'all the gear no idea' territory but snapped up one of these for a bit of a bargain (imo, for what it is). Took a gamble as Ive never used a rangefinder but enjoying it already for the few frames I made today
1 Attachment
-
• #1734
Love these! Some of my favourite ever images I made one of these. Delta 3200.
3 Attachments
-
• #1735
Amazing! Do you not have yours anymore? Any tips on using it? Def want to get some 3200. Basically grainless with negs that big...
Do they made slide film in 120? 6x9 slide negs would be amazing -
• #1736
I just had a shot for a couple of days. I'm actually in Texas at the moment, I'm going to look in a second hand camera store for one today! Slide is widely available in 120.
-
• #1737
That’s a good MF camera
-
• #1738
Looking to buy a texas leica in texas ?
-
• #1739
Exactly. Meta.
-
• #1740
Have been there couple months ago, market for that type of camera seems like sacrificing one for another kind of choice. (viewfinder, lens, portability,...) Unless you want to spend on the RX1R of the Q.
Not really a fan of the rendering of Sony which would require too much work in post, where as the Q does it all straight out the box, at least more than the Sony. (is there a thing such as free time with toddlers?)
But then, the Q has a 28mm where the RX1R has a 35mm, where I find the 28 a bit too wide for general use. Have had the Canon 28 f1.8 before my Sigma 35 F1.4 and prefer that for documenting life in general.
Panasonic S1 looks interesting, but totally different class of product.
-
• #1742
Oh man I had the automatic version of that camera, it was basically a huge point and shoot. I shot some slide MF a while back.
Ended up selling the camera as I felt it some what limiting (plus I couldn't always trust the AF).
-
• #1743
Oh and for the first time in my life I'm seriously considering picking up a Leica. I'd always toyed with the idea but it had always been a sort of pipe dream ever since seeing Winogrands M4.
I'm thinking an M6 plus probably a voigtlander M series to get me started - 35 14 nokton.
Is this a good place to start?
-
• #1744
Yup, I had that combo a while back. The nokton is pretty nice, a bit soft wide open but nice rendering.
-
• #1745
To be honest I'm not sure how often I'd be shooting that wide open - 1.4 sounds great in theory.
-
• #1746
There is now a Chinese m-mount 35mm f2 lens that's supposed to be quite good.
-
• #1747
For what it's worth the VC Colour Skopar 35/2.5 is a very good lens. I had both the 1.4 and the 2.5 and enjoyed them both. Highly recommend !
Also Red Dot in London sell VC gear if you're in the neighbourhood and want to test stuff out.
M
-
• #1748
The 35/2.5 is a lovely compact size.
-
• #1749
Agreed, lives happily on my A6000.
-
• #1750
I do so frequently. However, I make no claim to my photos being any good.
You use a light meter?