I think theres a difference between a normal state case and a RICO case though. if I remember correctly, a RICO case could effectively outlaw the Trump organisation in its entirety under that name.
It basically has to prove that the organisation as an entity is rotten and unlawful at all levels but also the burden of proof is apparently lower than traditional cases. I might have read that wrongly though.
Essentially a state case would mean they can keep on trading after...maybe with a change of top level personnel but there would be nothing to stop trump coming back to it after the presidency...
Possibly, but the NY probes, AIUI, are specific to the (mis)behaviour of the Trump charitable organisations. Basically - charities need to behave like charities and if they don't they can be stripped of that designation and can be prosecuted for fraud.
I think theres a difference between a normal state case and a RICO case though. if I remember correctly, a RICO case could effectively outlaw the Trump organisation in its entirety under that name.
It basically has to prove that the organisation as an entity is rotten and unlawful at all levels but also the burden of proof is apparently lower than traditional cases. I might have read that wrongly though.
Essentially a state case would mean they can keep on trading after...maybe with a change of top level personnel but there would be nothing to stop trump coming back to it after the presidency...