-
• #17852
Love those.
-
• #17853
Turns out the 15 year old Porta UC I found in a shoebox at home might have benefitted from not being stored in a shoebox for 15 years. Even overexposing it a stop didn't help. Will post results once I've rescued it a bit in post...
-
• #17854
If anyone's looking to get some E6 processing done, I've just used John Salim (not seen him mentioned on here before) and can thoroughly recommend. £4.70 a roll aint bad.
-
• #17855
So many glowing horizons, smh. But for £6 dev and scan I don't really care. It's only blog fodder after all!
-
• #17856
I sent filmdev a roll saying give me the highest possible resolution scans, they are 150mb+ TIFs and all great! No idea which scanner they used.
-
• #17857
..check EXIF data?
-
• #17858
not much ..
1 Attachment
-
• #17859
Is there any point in having a 150mb tif for a 30mp image? And if it's 35mm is there actually that amount of detail in the grain? I was told that the finest grain 35mm film is about 20-25mp at best.
-
• #17860
6x7, i have no idea tbh
-
• #17861
In that case I'd be after more resolution, personally!
-
• #17862
150Mb, should be an Imacon ?
-
• #17863
But the output resolution would be higher, 6x7 @ 3200dpi comes out at 7500x8800~
-
• #17864
Thanks for all the advice in terms of not getting the most out of my medium format camera. Found this in a drawer and been out shooting on my lunch break, I can feel the addiction slowly coming back...
1 Attachment
-
• #17865
50mm 1.2! NAWTY.
-
• #17866
.
-
• #17867
Ye I got a really blurry pic back in my latest roll that I took after a fair few pints, which I also strangely don't totally hate. Show us yours then ?
1 Attachment
-
• #17868
Usually, anything but perfectly in focus and sharp pisses me off, but somehow in my last batch I've got a pair of completely blurry photos I quite like!
2 Attachments
-
• #17869
That bottom one is great
-
• #17870
Santander. HP5.
1 Attachment
-
• #17871
Yes yes yes indeed.
-
• #17872
Also, you can add "totally weird as fuck redeye correction" to the list of things filmdev do :-/
That's terrible. I guess they stick the machine on auto and crank them out with minimal intervention, hence the low price for C41.
I won't be using them again, their over sharpening makes things like Ektar grainy. -
• #17873
Found this in a drawer and been out shooting on my lunch break, I can feel the addiction slowly coming back...
Nice thing to have hidden in the back of a drawer !
-
• #17874
Nice pic but what's the combo film/dev/scan ? So much grain but look like it's not the original grain.
-
• #17875
SO MUCH GRAIN. It's pretty bonkers really. And what's annoying about the redeye thing is that undoing the automatic mess is a pain, but just clicking with the PS redeye tool is a piece of piss and works much better (99% of the time anyway).
They are quite sharp though indeed
: ]