-
• #30552
@h2o @BleakRefs
Just found out they’ve done a limited edition for Air France (possibly not for sale to prols), I like they’ve dropped the sub second divisions but not sure about the colour scheme, think I prefer the original. What’s so good is how thin it is, the proportions are cracking.
2 Attachments
-
• #30553
Excuse me for my ignorance but how come the watch turned out to be worth more when it's inconsistent?
The black face is rare - according to Omega they never made them. However, enough exist for there to be no doubt that they did.
Freddo believes that the watch is "numbers matching", i.e. case, bezel, hands, movement and dial are all original, and with the rare face he thinks that this means that the watch (was) undervalued.
The chap who wrote the site that Freddo directed me too earlier (https://www.omegaploprof.com/) believes that the dial and movement are not original to the case, and that the rarity of the dial colour doesn't off-set the lack of originality.
This is the correct dial for the case, but has a service bezel and a movement swap:
(And it's been turned round at some point in the past, but can be put back to the correct orientation).
It's just over a thousand pounds cheaper than the watch I was looking at.
I prefer the Isofrane strap, but the metal bracelet is also quite nice.
-
• #30554
Kinda prefer that sods-side-up
-
• #30555
I feeling a bit guilty I ever mentioned the word Ploprof.
I wonder if I buy the blue and white one if people will argue about with as much gusto in 40 years.
Once again I’m very sorry. -
• #30556
If that didn’t make any sense it’s because I’ve been playing a drinking game whilst watching the apprentice.
-
• #30557
I watched Dr Strange and wondered why he didn’t do the thing with the thing to fix his JLC.
-
• #30558
If we agree that vintage ploprof are difficult then let’s not get started on old Subs or heaven forbid vintage speedmaster!!
-
• #30559
Excuse me for my ignorance but how come the watch turned out to be worth more when it's inconsistent?
We were not in agreement that there was an inconsistency ;)
-
• #30560
If we agree that vintage ploprof are difficult then let’s not get started on old Subs or heaven forbid vintage speedmaster!!
Indeed. This is from Moonwatchonly, the definitive guide of course for speedmasters, but applies well to all vintage watches
Collectors must be extremely cautious when they look for information on the web. Incorrect information could lead them to conclude that their model is in a wrong configuration, and to change some components. This would be catastrophic if an original component stated as wrong / service, would be replaced.
Therefore, the observation & validation cycle is fundamental rule and a necessary step to get the guarantee of reliable information when analyzing and collecting vintage watches.
-
• #30561
Can anyone confirm a half-remembered story I thought I’d seen about U.S.-built Rolexes? Built under licence with all legitimate parts to avoid some tax/customs issue? I seem to recall they had an additional logo on the face.. perhaps just after WW2?
-
• #30562
Mmmmmmm. Approved.
-
• #30563
Picked up a new beauty
1 Attachment
-
• #30564
Needs pendulous ball sack.
-
• #30565
Genius
-
• #30566
Needs pendulous ball sack.
It would need to be linked to the movement so it rocks each second...
-
• #30567
Felix the cat clock, but thrusty hips. Make it happen.
-
• #30568
centuries old, just google erotic watches or erotic pocket watches.
and a nice collection here
https://dangerousminds.net/comments/objects_of_desire_vintage_erotic_pocket_watches
-
• #30569
Not very good at painting dicks were they?
-
• #30570
Bro, do you even ancient Greeks & Romans?
-
• #30571
Yea, porn is as old as time. Lots of ‘masterpieces’ in the art world were only ever commissioned to hang in bedrooms to help people get off. Now they are ‘hmm’d and ‘ooo’d at in museums.
-
• #30572
Interesting last few pages. This watch thing is fascinating. Why buy a watch? It tells the time - Casio £8 on Amazon. Fancier watches can be more expensive but still tell the time.
Buying to wear - buy what you like.
Buying to invest - get advice from an expert and splurge the cash (and cross fingers)I found the PP discussion most interesting and I still don’t really understand what happened at the end. If I liked the watch, I’d buy it and it seems it may have been a bargain.
I’m still pondering buying a good watch but I’m coming to realise that I should buy what I like and not what a general consensus of opinion thinks. I might ( likely) go and have another look at a Speedmaster on my own and see if my opinion has changed.
Some lovely watches over the past few pages too. I’ll drool in my coffee.
-
• #30573
Fancier watches can be more expensive but still tell the time, just less accurately.
FTFY
-
• #30574
I didn’t want to say that specifically. My Apple Watch friend mentions this regularly. He has a vintage Rolex which loses time. I tell him it’s not really the point. He’s practical and I dream.
-
• #30575
Would you consider a vintage Speedmaster? I initially tried a new one just out of curiosity as I’d discounted it on size and then slowly discovered as I read more that I like the aged lume on the indices and hands, greying dial, early bracelet etc.
I think @ejay2.0 posted a nice picture of his new and old ones side by side...
Excuse me for my ignorance but how come the watch turned out to be worth more when it's inconsistent?