-
• #121077
Ah which picture?
-
• #121078
Ah which picture?
My mistake, thought you were replying to frankenbike's Soma suggestion.
-
• #121079
Last time I checked he was still going strong.
-
• #121081
Did someone mention wanting a totally pointless but utterly fantastic in every way carbon gravel bike??
HMU. -
• #121082
So the weight of the wheels being roughly the same is perhaps a myth?
Not in my experience.
Making the jump to tubeless at the same time helps as big 27.5 tubes aren’t light. And you could go weight weenie to a greater degree on a smaller/stronger wheel. But overall it’s ~ 100g a wheel or thereabouts. Nothing you’re going to notice.
EDIT: Regarding rolling resistance - how come a wider tire run with lower pressure has same rolling resistance then a 28mm tire with higher pressure?
-
• #121083
Not the 3t Shirley
Edit: doesn’t matter, just checked the price of a new 3t frameset. Not a chance I can afford it anyway
-
• #121084
If a 25 mm tire has 5% less rolling resistance over 23mm tire then a 47 mm tire must have like 45-50% less rolling resistance over a 28 mm tire!
Good read but kinda irrelevant.
Yes, lower trail is probably what makes the 700c to 650b conversions feel more lively.
Was also a good point about going tubeless, probably some precious grams saved there!
Let’s move on.
-
• #121085
Most people look for an excuse to own more bikes. Not less. Phil are you feeling ill?
-
• #121087
If a 25 mm tire has 5% less rolling resistance over 23mm tire then a 47 mm tire must have like 45-50% less rolling resistance over a 28 mm tire!
Yes. On terrain that requires an equal percentage of suspension-to-volume as the 23mm tyre (I think).
Further reading.
https://www.schwalbe.com/en-GB/rollwiderstand.html -
• #121088
If a 25 mm tire has 5% less rolling resistance over 23mm tire then a 47 mm tire must have like 45-50% less rolling resistance over a 28 mm tire!
Reverse #ubinscobled
-
• #121089
I’m adding a mountain bike, looking for a bike to replace one I already own so really I’ll be 1 up, not down :)
-
• #121090
I’m adding a mountain bike
Don't do it.
@Pawlus @miro_o That Schwalbe link is pretty good, basically rolling resistance keeps going down with wider tyres (at the same pressure!!) until you get to a perfectly round contact patch since the circumference 0f the contact patch is where rolling resistance is created and circle has the lowest circumference for it's area (and the area stays the same at the same pressure):
-
• #121091
Looks about that, would look super clean with a flat transition, bit like some of the Look bikes.
-
• #121092
Still want to put some 650s on my Equilibrium after seeing yours. Did you sell the wheels or just the frameset?
-
• #121093
Still got the frameset and the wheels are on my partner's bike.
-
• #121094
Previous gen Fugio with different forks/braze ons added/guard adapters?
1 Attachment
-
• #121095
basically rolling resistance keeps going down with wider tyres (at the same pressure!!)
But you cannot keep the same pressure for larger tires as the casing tension is higher. There is a thing as too high pressure, and it is not the same for small and large tires.
There is a sweet spot for rolling resistance. For good roads the advantage of larger tires ebbs out at about 30mm.more here:
https://silca.cc/blogs/journal/part-4b-rolling-resistance-and-impedance -
• #121096
There is a sweet spot for rolling resistance. For good roads the advantage of larger tires ebbs out at about 30mm.
Like I said, rolling resistance keeps going down until the contact area is a circle. For different pressures and system weights (rider + bike + luggage) there will be a different tyre width where the contact area is a circle. For a certain system weight at road pressures that could be 30mm, but that won't be the case for everyone.
-
• #121097
Ah, I thought you sold it. What size tyres did you manage to clear with guards?
-
• #121098
Diggin that build
-
• #121099
G-One Speeds kinda fit in 38mm
-
• #121100
Love that, any idea on tyre size? Look like 32's on there.
Looks like a posher arkose