• Put another way, why would they change their core principles, diluting them, for a member who is leaving?

    Playing devils advocate - because it might be to the overall benefit of its actual citizens.

  • Or the detriment in the long run

    Some core principles benefit citizens. The UK pissing on other EU citizens for example is not something that necessary will benefit other EU citizens.

    If the EU dilutes freedom of movement, which is already reliant on having work / money / family reasons, other EU countries may follow to attempt to lock in their citizens or screw over EU state immigrants.

    Not that this is so great as everyone will hurt but there's a risk of fewer rights / protection with concessions.

  • Or the detriment in the long run

    Obviously. I don't think either side is really thinking of their citizens first though.

About

Avatar for JWestland @JWestland started