-
• #552
'wood skewers car'
Wouldn't have happened if the fence was wearing high vis and had a number plate.
Wanton and furious fencing just isn't enough!! We need more laws. -
• #553
If you take out the brief mention of the fact that the car hit the fence in the standfirst, the article really does read as if the fence just attacked the car.
This sounds like one of the many crashes involving young people after a night out, although it may of course have happened on the way to wherever they were going to go out to. Such crashes are frequently fatal, so in that respect they will undoubtedly have been lucky.
-
• #554
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-43815325
Driver crashes car in to home killing woman inside. Grim.
-
• #555
Oh no, that's horrible.
-
• #556
It's always amazing how when vehicles crash into buildings it's the building occupants who get hurt. You'd think brick walls would be tougher than cars/vans.
-
• #557
Vehicles designed to protect the occupants at all costs in high energy impacts. Houses...not so much.
From the pictures it looks like the driver ploughed the van in to what was a converted garage.
-
• #558
Yes, that's about the size of it, the combination of that kind of engineering in a car and probably a not-too-solid wall.
-
• #559
The picture with this article was either taken after the car had been moved or 'a wall near to City of London police station' is code for 'the City of London police station'.
No news on whether the injured man was in the car or hit while walking along the footway.
-
• #560
-
• #561
'Driver' statue nearly taken out by minivan at Puyallup post office: bit.ly/2L3B7zR pic.twitter.com/wWBE5XTtdm
-
• #562
Vehicle has struck the bridge on Mortlake Road. Please avoid the area where possible. (img: @rosandamcgrath) @Jackie_Travel @TfL pic.twitter.com/i7r8bVlkTf
-
• #563
That doesn't look as if the building was struck.
-
• #564
Picture:
Building or structure? You decide.
-
• #565
Something was built.
It was hit by a motor vehicle.
That's close enough. -
• #567
building - a structure with roof and walls
I can bivvy under that bridge because it has a roof and it has walls, so building it is (albeit a little breezier than a bus stop).
Thanks OED. #hippyisalwaysright
-
• #568
It's not my battle to fight.
I was the first one to post a bridge in this thread.
See the previous discussion seven million pages back. :)
(As if you'd fit under that bridge.)
-
• #569
Can we also argue that the vehicle itself didn't actually hit the building/structure?
-
• #570
Your first post, presumably edited after the great bridge is a building battle??
"This thread also includes lorries and buses crashing into bridges, as bridges are buildings." -
• #571
"I think a bridge is a structure. Wikipedia says:
A building or (Edifice), is a man-made structure with a roof and walls standing more or less permanently in one place, such as a house or factory.
Dictionary definitions variously define a building as something for human habitation or use, or a structure with a roof and walls.
To me a building should have a roof and walls, at least of sorts. I concede your point on the shopfront though."
- "I think" No committed enough. Lost the argument already
- "Wikipedia says" Hahahaha
- I can just change the thread title to whatever I want anyway so #hippyisalwaysright
- "I think" No committed enough. Lost the argument already
-
• #572
Ah, but which vehicle? Is a crane even a vehicle? OMG Metadefinitions!
-
• #573
ahem articulated boom lift
-
• #574
bigshape
Wait, has hippy changed his username?
-
• #575
"A large, tall machine used for moving heavy objects by suspending them from a projecting arm or beam."
"projecting arm" = "boom"
"suspending" = liftThanks again OED. Love your work.
Down with fences. Boo.