-
• #31327
Maths is the answer
-
• #31328
Rapha trying to keep you on your toes
-
• #31329
I have older and newer medium randonee shorts, newer are defo bigger, but I have a belt.
-
• #31330
Sportful hotpack ultralight, 50g, smaller than a tennis ball when compressed.
-
• #31331
I did order a bright orange hotpack in the end. The ultralight seems to come in see through silver-ish only, and the extra 20g don't worry me all that much.
Also, I am quite happy with all my other sportful stuff, so happy to just give it a try at about AUD100 less than the rapha brevet jacket. -
• #31332
Nice, but I bet its a bit pricey
-
• #31333
@Chopsicle Size guides should be correct now.
-
• #31334
Didn’t realise the regular one was only 20g more! Ive got the ultralight but it’s a medium and I need a small really. I’ve always been very impressed with sportful in general, so I might have to look for a regular one in small.
-
• #31335
Just Castelli of course...
-
• #31336
Well not quite, they're sister companies, which is quite different to being the same product with a different name on it.
In the same way that a Skoda isn't a VW...
-
• #31337
Well, 58g vs 86g, so 28g diff.
-
• #31339
Errr, you’ve lost me..
-
• #31340
Members of the Walmart family are also investors in Rapha.
was being facetious too
-
• #31341
Ahh gotcha, had no idea re: Walmart/Rapha!
Got that was facetious ;) just had no idea why!
-
• #31342
Interesting new
raphaerm shimano jersey... -
• #31343
Oooooh hello cease and desist.
-
• #31344
Didnt torm come across the same problen.
-
• #31345
There is too little original in the Rapha designs to try to go up against someone as big as Shimano. Sick fades are hardly copyrightable, likewise one could claim prior art on the arm band (Hugo Boss's 1939 collection...)
https://www.newmediarights.org/business_models/artist/can_you_copyright_clothing_designs
-
• #31346
Torm were/are small enough to be intimidated by Raphas lawyers.
-
• #31347
I think from what i read they went to the mill and cut off their supply .
-
• #31348
Torm literally ordered a Classic Jersey size set and replicated it, feature for feature, stitch for stitch, including the IP registered details, just another armband. The jerseys were returned after a few weeks for full refund.
IP laws are there to protect everyone, from multinationals to sole traders; it works both ways to protect the investment into a developing and establishing a product/concept/brand/innovation. If anyone can make a decent argument supporting this naive/stupid/lazy/brazen approach, please, I'd love to hear it
-
• #31349
And I agree, the fade is different from the solid colour-blocked armband. However, as a brand mark becomes more established, it becomes easier to argue an infringement. ie Cadbury now protect the shade of purple used on wrappers, but I probably wouldn't be able to setup a chocolate bar company from my kitchen and register say, a blue foil wrapper, until the colour became ubiquitous with my brand.
-
• #31350
The pic was from an article on http://www.cyclingweekly.com about their 2019 range, so maybe it’s something they’ll rethink.
I struggle to understand what they were thinking with the armband though.
https://www.lfgss.com/comments/14303060/