-
It's worth objecting, on the grounds of reducing precedence, and that their reasoning is poor. All I said, was that I can understand why people would want to ban bicycles, and that if it were not a time trial course, and a very fast one, no one would care.
I said duel carriageways can be safer to make the point, that they're not necessarily unsafe, simply because traffic is fast flowing.
skinny-
Every bastard driver wants bikes banned from every road because we're "a nuisance", "in their way", "don't pay road tax". Fuck them. It's only because it was mentioned by CTT I knew anything about the proposed ban and just like I objected to the removal of the bike parking in Ealing - if it wasn't on the Ealing Cycling mailing list I'd have no idea it was even an issue. I'll object to banning bikes wherever I can. We need to normalise bike use and remove dangerous driving, not remove bicycles.
hippy
So you're happy to sit back and watch some NIMBYs with no actual interest in your safety ban a bunch of roads? The you're limited to racing on SC roads, some of which you say aren't as safe as the DC? Tell me again why it's not worth kicking a fuss about bicycle road bans?