Language in T&Cs speaks of 'without prejudice'. Say I want to chivvy them along. Would I be prejudicing myself if I gave them an offer between small claims court and a mediator? I.e. could it be inferred under English contract law that by offering one of those two solutions if they're not planning to pay me that I'm releasing them of any obligation to do so?
So ANOTHER client owes us a sum of money.
Language in T&Cs speaks of 'without prejudice'. Say I want to chivvy them along. Would I be prejudicing myself if I gave them an offer between small claims court and a mediator? I.e. could it be inferred under English contract law that by offering one of those two solutions if they're not planning to pay me that I'm releasing them of any obligation to do so?