You are reading a single comment by @frankenbike and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So, my guess (and I've been drinking) is that the limit is when the vertical component of the propulsion (rider weight on the pedals causes bike to move forwards and up a slope) is counter balanced by the gain in gravitational potential energy from moving up the slope.

    Lower gear = less forward motion (and therefore a smaller vertical component).

    ICBA with the maths right now, will see if being sober in the morning helps.

  • Okay, I was too interested and had to do a quick calculation...

    GPE down the slope:
    Rider is k above the minimum position on the bike (k is one crank length - cranks are parallel with the ground)
    Bike and rider at minimum position on the slope
    GPE_start = m_rider * g * k

    GPE up the slope:
    Rider at minimum position on the bike (cranks perpendicular to the ground, riders weight on lower pedal)
    Bike and rider distance d up the slope
    GPE_end = (m_rider + m_bike) * g * d sin(theta)

    d = k / [(1 + m_bike/m_rider) * sin(theta)]

    d is (metric) gear inches / 4 - we only considered a quarter revolution of the cranks

    For k = 0.175m, m_bike = 10kg, m_rider = 75kg, theta = 20deg, we get d = 0.451m or 17.8 inches

    So that's 71.2 gear inches, which is bang on a 43/16 on a 25mm, 700c tyre, a fairly typical fixie gear ratio! How satisfying!

    To cycle up a 45 degree slope with the same bike weight, cranks, etc., you only need a 34/26!

    Of course I'm ignoring drivetrain losses, loss of traction, what the upper foot is doing, the use of your muscles, etc.

About

Avatar for frankenbike @frankenbike started