-
• #202
I'm not and I'm still going to give him grief for posting that bike in this thread. The OP made it very clear what the ethos behind the thread was, and shit MTBs don't fit that. So don't fucking post them.
-
• #203
From cycling weekly
2 Attachments
-
• #204
Boo hoo
-
• #205
Thanks for a solid on-topic interjection.
-
• #207
Stitched together:
Those are some funny looking cranks!
:-)
-
• #208
Always thought the PX Nanolight would make a good base for cheap hillclimb bike...
-
• #209
S P A M
-
• #210
Joscelin Lowden's I believe?
-
• #211
Berk saddle/post?
-
• #213
Looks better fixed
-
• #214
Part 2:
-
• #215
Bit disappointing that after putting in all of that effort and research to build 'the perfect hillclimb bike', his conclusion is that gears are better. Could have tried riding fixed first before commissioning a custom race bike!
-
• #216
Spoilers!
-
• #218
brake blocks could be filed down a bit
-
• #219
need to lose some grams but not sure where.. reluctant to buy a set of chinese carbon tubs just for a few HC's
ive got a sram force 22 groupset knocking about, might fit that, should be lighter than ultegra?
1 Attachment
-
• #220
Wheels and cranks probably biggest bits, that a power meter? Switch it out for racing?
Lose FD and a chainring? -
• #221
Almost 200g to be saved by switching to Veloflex Record or Conti Supersonic. PX brakes are lighter than Ultegra.
Depends how much effort you're willing to invest in butchering you drivetrain. Single ring etc. Cutting drops off...
-
• #222
cant see PX brakes on their site anymore :(
might buy some second hand bars to hack, full carbon saddle
-
• #223
Chinese carbon saddle is the cheapest / easiest weight loss.
Bottle cages, bolts, lights (obvs)
-
• #224
4.9kg
-
• #225
Proper job. Well, apart from the clinchers ;)
I'm pregnant. Give me a break.