You are reading a single comment by @amey and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
amey
-
No. Not any longer.
Been down the fully bespoke machines, and prefer bespoke within the parameters of standard parts and consumables.
Hence the rack. Any bag would work... standard stuff is fine way into the future. But I could commission a bag. And if I did commission a bag, it would take standard dry sacks and not be a bespoke shape/size.
Velocio
The Carradice C rack top bag isn't bad, nor is the Ortlied rack top bags (limited by not being able to be used without panniers).
But perhaps a more modern version of those in a very thin, light, but durable (rip-proof) fabric. Not looking for any weather proofness as I imagine packing dry bags as standard.
I imagine a rack top back that compresses height wise (to the extreme of being a flat piece of fabric and a couple of straps when empty), and that it would fit 2 standard size dry bags lying on top of each other.
The compression would provide a lot of the stability so it doesn't swing around like a saddle bag can. When filled with 1 dry bag compression would be enough, when filled with 2 the extra height affords a touch more space behind the seat cluster, so I like the idea of a nose to the bag that can be pulled across that space and that also provides a little aero shape and a little more stability if I've been a lazy packer.
All of this means that the bag would be flat, stable, and not too high. Which frees the underside of the saddle and part of the seat post for lighting, cameras, tool bag, etc.
This is just an idea... I haven't really thought about exact details, but I knew that if I wanted to commission such a bag for a rack, that the bike needed the mounts for racks.
Besides, a bike with rack mounts and mudguard mounts is a bike for life. I was frustrated at times that I couldn't use the Serotta for some of the riding I did, it was a fabulous bike but didn't adapt to how I wanted to use it.