• Probably should add that I had a typo in my earlier statement which changed the meaning slightly but I think most people got it. It's just an alternative view that corporates are simply a body of individuals that could be taxed more effectively than the corporate body.

    I'm a lot closer to eat the rich and f**k it all given that I can't think of a single period in history where there has been a decent balance in society and money doesn't define life for the individual or society.

  • It's just an alternative view that corporates are simply a body of individuals that could be taxed more effectively than the corporate body.

    Yeah, this. Always thought taxing profit was a bit odd. Turnover, as described above, might make more sense. Might not.

About

Avatar for Airhead @Airhead started