-
• #2727
Well clearly I read that wrong!
edit it was the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/08/general-election-exit-poll-accurate-could/
-
• #2728
Am in Italy, and a little homesick watching minute-by-minute footage of provincial UK leisure centres on RaiNews24...
-
• #2729
Osbourne shafting May on ITV - hilarious.
-
• #2730
That's impressive accuracy. I'm a bit ashamed I didn't know just how good they are (or were, but let's hope are).
-
• #2731
No love lost there
-
• #2732
Oz bot shafting May bot = non electric dreams
-
• #2733
Good turnout it seems.
The youth?
the Corbyn/grandad factor -
• #2734
Good god life will be better if Amber Rudd gets the fuckoff
-
• #2735
In related news I'm going to ask for my salary to be paid in Euro, fixed at todays exchange rate.
You might have just made an Etap got confirmed?
-
• #2736
The reshuffle will be hilarious as the media has failed to cover true resentments in the tory front benches
although Gove may be allowed to come off the naughty step
-
• #2737
https://twitter.com/Emmabarnett/status/872945482775003137
Boris is nihilist.
-
• #2738
Patel is rubbish here. Why has she bothered?
-
• #2739
Priti Patel doing a good Maybot v2 on BBC..Can't watch anymore.
-
• #2740
sunderland - labour
again tory vote seems underestimate / explanation is strong tory postal vote not accounted for
-
• #2741
I'm going to eat a crisp every time someone makes themselves clear. I started worrying about my stamina when they brought Patel on
-
• #2742
https://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2017/ model (scroll down) has been pretty bloody good so far
-
• #2743
Labour actually generally doing slightly better than the YouGov model at the moment..
-
• #2744
I enjoyed my blissful half hour from 10-10.30, bouncing off the walls and texting everyone. Now it's nail-biting stuff
-
• #2745
Wish I had crisps.
-
• #2746
I had popcorn. Lasted about 10 mins, but luckily I get to spend the next 8 hours busy picking it out my teeth and gums
-
• #2747
Swindish bastards. 4-1
-
• #2748
tory hold swindon north - exit poll seemed overestimate
labour hold newcastle east - exit poll seemed underestimate
seems close enough to the exit poll to justify staying up all night
-
• #2749
But swing to Labour better than exit poll prediction.
-
• #2750
Veeeeerrrry interesting.
October 1974
ITN: Wrong by 12
BBC: Wrong by 132
1979
ITN: Wrong by 20
BBC: Wrong by 29
1983
ITN: Wrong by 28
BBC: Wrong by 2
1987
ITN: Wrong by 34
BBC: Wrong by 76
1992
ITN: Wrong by 62
BBC: Wrong by 70
1997
ITN: Wrong by 20
BBC: Wrong by 6
But in the last decade and a half the exit polls have become much more accurate.
Here are the figures for 2001.
ITN: Wrong by 8
BBC: Wrong by 10
From 2005 onwards there has been a joint exit poll, firstly commissioned for ITN and the BBC, and then, from 2010 onwards, for Sky too. Its record has been much better.
2005
Wrong by 0. It predicted a Labour majority of 66, which Labour got.
2010
Wrong by 0. It said the Tories would be 19 short of a majority, and they were.
2015
Wrong by 22. It said the Tories would be 10 seats short of a majority, but they got a majority of 12.