You are reading a single comment by @stevo_com and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • to have to go full on army in the streets is a direct result of the culling of front line police roles.

    Playing devil's advocate here in relation to your point, isn't that a better use of limited funds?

    If we accept (for this example) that more police wouldn't have prevented this. Then using the forces to step in and fill a shortfall for an uncommon event makes more sense than having extra permanent police.

  • The police forces are already stretched and operating at or beyond capacity. None of the 20,000 were "extra"

    Deploying the military in this instance is just another symptom of an already overstretched police force.

    I would rather have funding funneled into policing than 'defense'.

About

Avatar for stevo_com @stevo_com started