It's not really considered doping, quackery is probably the best description of the practice. Anyway, the anti-doping arm of the Belgian federation recommended Van Avermaet get a two year ban, but had no evidence to back this up so he was acquitted.
No evidence that he'd done it, or no evidence that a two-year ban was needed?
No evidence that he'd done it, or no evidence that a two-year ban was needed?