-
• #12977
... so you are missing the Fujifilm raw conversion software?
Do any of the cloud raw-dng converters work? It's a long-shot I know.
Capture One?
The lab can't covert these?
-
• #12978
Tried "RawTherapee" and "Total Image Converter" (which doesn't even see the file in the folder) so far, and PS obviously.
Will try some of the cloud ones..Surprised I can't find useful information on this via google..
-
• #12979
When you open the raw files in photoshop, does it ask you to specify dimensions?
Yes
-
• #12981
I think if you were to put in the original dimensions of the image you'd get something resembling the original image. If you don't know it, you could probably get it by trial and error, just keep decreasing the width until everything ends up in the correct place
-
• #12982
Tried this just for shits and giggles, alas the proportion of weird stuff vs. black bar stays constant no matter how I in- or decrease the width..
-
• #12983
-
• #12984
The lab can't covert these?
No.
The guy from the lab said they asked Fuji Germany who could not help them either (???) -
• #12985
-
• #12986
..going through some old folders; sorry if I have posted one of these already, think not though..
-
• #12987
-
• #12988
Has anyone on here shot Kodak Pro Image film?
It used to be available via eBay from a Thai seller that shut down apparently.. now there's a new guy from South Korea.
Have never bought stuff from there through eBay, wondering if it's worth it.
Like the colours, they're somewhat muted, but not numb. It's looks "understated", in a good way, I think.
Here's some images on flickr.. -
• #12989
-
• #12990
This is Ultramax 400 by the way..
-
• #12991
-
• #12992
Something from nothing, really like this shot despite the mundane subject! Really great colours.
-
• #12993
In other news I just finished a roll of Portra 400 shot with a borrowed "Revue 400 SE" (rumors have it it's a replica of the famous Hi-Matic 7SII / Konica S3).
Shot the last frames during the past sunny days with fresh snow - gorgeous light and colours here in Berlin - only to discover after rewinding and getting the canister out of the camera that it was actually an Agfa APX 400 I had put in there.. (insert facepalm.jpg) -
• #12994
..cheers!
-
• #12995
I've shot it!
http://seanalexanderfisher.com/tagged/sanfrancisco
They're all from it developed and scanned at Asda shot on an olympus XA2
:)
-
• #12996
Ah, yeah - I remeber that airport shot!
Nice!Where did you get the film from? Bought in the states?
-
• #12997
nope, I got it online from the Thai place you mentioned earlier.
Thanks!
-
• #12998
Exhibition recommendation.
If you're passing, I recommend Malick Sidibe at Somerset House.
B&W studio & party shots - mostly Rollei TLR and all deeply charming. -
• #12999
-
• #13000
Nice portrait. I know what you mean about looking at the actual transparency...
Thank you, and also @miro_o for your feedback!
There has been a bit of misunderstanding though -
that Frontier software apparently gives two options for high quality scans: 1) tiff 16 base, and 2) lossless.
The files they gave me were created using the tiff 16 base option - giving me the 16.9 MB, 2433 x 2433 px .TIF files (from 6x6 negative).
The "weird" image I included in the earlier post with the black bar at the bottom (a 55.9 MB .RAW file originally) was given to me just to see if I could somehow open / convert it - which is, according to that guy in the lab, only possible with special software from Fuji Japan - which is why they don't hand out these .RARs to customers, but tiffs (or jpegs) instead.