You are reading a single comment by @Fox and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • then you'd have to take the 6 years consumer law argument with the retailer, not Apple and good luck with that. I have never experienced a single retailer that is as open as Apple about honouring this law.

    Unless it's a global recall than it's a different matter. Also consumer rights don't apply to unsatisfactory performance as it is a rather subjective thing. The law only really applies to manufacturer defaults etc... In any case, good luck with it.

  • you'd have to take the 6 years consumer law argument with the retailer, not Apple and good luck with that

    I've had joy doing this. It's amazing what a letter before action can do.

    I don't think it would work in this case though. The relevant law requires things to be 'fit for purpose'. Time and GPS messing up on a phone is annoying but doesn't make it unfit for purpose overall.

  • I'm not sure about that. The phone was advertised with GPS, GPS never worked, hence feature is not fit for sale.

    Bit like how people got money back on PS3 when they removed the linux install feature years after release.

About

Avatar for Fox @Fox started