But it does mean that the Royal family have since George III probably provided net gain to the taxpayer (or, to the treasury at least,) tourism be damned?
They just figured out that it was easier to hand over responsibility for national security etc to someone else, along with some of the national assets.
But it does mean that the Royal family have since George III probably provided net gain to the taxpayer (or, to the treasury at least,) tourism be damned?