You are reading a single comment by @JWestland and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
"But it does need to be dealt with efficiently without however rushing matters."
And that's perhaps the snag: May goes "let's do this in 2017" even though it's now become clear how mega complex it's going to be. So not rushing matter may be 2018...2019...
I'm happy enough though with the verdict as disabling checks in democracy is where fascism lies.
With the Tories getting on as if this advisory referendum with no clarification on the type of exit (stay in EEC/fully leave) gave them the power to do whatever they want, I think it's good they now have actually negotiate with Parliament.
JWestland
I must confess that as someone who voted to leave in the referendum (and did so with some regret), I'm not overly bothered by this development. Whilst I don't think it will make much material difference to the path the country will ultimately take, anything that gives closer scrutiny to the arrangements, whatever form they take, isn't necessarily a bad thing.
But it does need to be dealt with efficiently without however rushing matters. Its the uncertainty in the manner in which we will be leaving that is the killer here IMO, not the inevitable decision that we will actually leaving, which I think is beyond doubt at this stage.
P.s I don't side with the daily mail et Al and i normally read the guardian, despite being a reluctant brexiter