-
• #5327
Awesome, just awesome.
Only thing left to do sadly, is to ride the shit out of it.
-
• #5328
Whats up with these new Si cranks?
are they just hollowgrams with differnt branding?
-
• #5329
yea, thats the hard part! Only done shorter rides so far, so the stem angle and length is still TBD
also need to install smp composit. Just got 2nd hand from italy via ebay
-
• #5330
This is RAAD. Seriously tempting - thought I'd made my mind up to build a Ritchey Road Logic but now...
-
• #5331
Pretty much, it's the heavier Hollowgram crank arm (Si is the budget version of the SiSL2), but with an adaptor to allow normal chainring to be fitted.
Meaning you can fit those one piece double chainset on it instead of the adaptor + FSA chainring, despite that, it is still pretty light at 540g.
-
• #5332
awesome
-
• #5333
No, they're not hollowgrams at all. They're forged cranks with a channel down the back, visible here:
-
• #5334
They are plain old forged cranks - think omnium like in construction that happen to fit the Si hollowgram axle.
-
• #5335
For some reason I kept calling it a Hollowgram cause it a branding.
Still at 540g without axles, it's pretty light, lighter than Ultegra even with the axles.
-
• #5336
Huh, cannondale does actually still call them HollowGrams though
confusing of them
-
• #5337
Those are 740g with rings
-
• #5338
Whether they call it Si or Hollowgram it's still confusing as fuck.
Here's the skinny.
Original BB30 crank, 144m Q:
Si [2001, silver, ltd edit. black, all discontinued]
SiSL [2007, black, discontinued]New BB30/a crank 144mm Q (or 147mm if you believe a Cannondale doc, but I don't.)
SiSL2 [2013, black 109mm axle]
Si hollowforged [2013, black, hollow, 109mm axle]
Si forged [2016, black, forged non-hollow, 109mm axle] -
• #5339
In that case, the Hollowgram name is basically branding rather than an indication that it's hollow.
-
• #5340
More like solid gram em i rite he he
-
• #5341
But yeah from what ive gathered upgrading to force/3d bb30 would be solely for looks. Red/3d+ for weight as well
-
• #5342
Well, before the Si forged crank they all were hollow...
I reckon that's just a bug in teh internetz; the data sheets I've seen refer to the Si forged crank as Cannondale Si
Still a good product as it takes the same hardware as the Hollowgram cranks, spidey, OPI and whatnot. Great for MTBs.
-
• #5343
very glad I got my Supersix while the Si were less shit than they are now!
-
• #5344
Even thought it's not hollow, the Si isn't shit to begin with, especially since they share the same axles as the higher end one, once the FSA ring worn out, you can always fit the Spidering on it.
-
• #5345
They still do both the Si and SiSL2 hollow cranks. The forged Si crank is their way of getting shouty and crappy fsa crank arms off their low spec high tier bikes.
-
• #5346
Such as the FSA Gossamer, the world's most inappropriately-named crank.
-
• #5347
I was building a weight-weenie six-evo hm a couple of yrs back and without knowing the specs assumed the Sisl2 was going to be the lightest between itself and Sram Red, especially as it was £700....but when I looked...Red was about 50g lighter and half the price.
I never understood the big deal about Sisl2 and hollowgram.
Anyone care to enlighten me? -
• #5349
-
• #5350
I'm not sure there's been a Red crank that's lighter or stiffer than Hollowgram SL or SiSL2.
But the weight difference is tiny, with the red crank being 60g or so heavier. So might as well call it even.
Hollowgrams just look better, have detachable spider, cross compatible with MTB shiz and IIRC stiffer...might be wrong on that though.
And you can trace their lineage back to this
Which is kinda cool
better pic