You are reading a single comment by @Jimmy_Fingers and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Except if the team are telling the truth, Yates didn't cross the line, the doctor put it on his paperwork for the race, so announced to the authorities he was taking the flipping stuff, but forgot the TUE. Pretty moronic if true.
Jimmy_Fingers-
I'm really gonna run with this line in the sand thing here, but...
If the line is you can use it as long as you fill out the paperwork and do the TUE, then he hasn't met those criteria and therefore crossed the line, and it's then been flagged up.Really sad as I really do like Yates and he's gonna have this for the rest of his career now
@hippy oh right, fair enough, cheers :)
noBlakes
Had a really heated debate about this the other day with a "why don't they just let them take all the drugs" view holder.
My reasoning is that whether there is or is not a benefit from taking it, it's legal if you follow the correct protocol, and if there is a tiny gain to be had even though it might be unethical, then as an athlete they should take it, it's not their responsibility to make the rules. When it's legal if you follow protocol - a line in the sand is drawn. In Yates' case, he tripped over the line and crossed it, but still crossed it (I may have run with that metaphor a bit too much)
In the same way that most athletes who took Meldonium probably didn't have a heart condition, most athletes that take asthma drugs probably don't have asthma. The problem is that asthma is very much on a continuum and putting a line along that, where some are asthmatic and some aren't, is extremely hard. In the case of Yates it seems he genuinely does have asthma; if Owain Doull is a reputable source:
https://twitter.com/owaindoull/status/725973890221137920
(how on earth do I embed tweets on here btw?)