-
• #3977
No, clearly it wasn't enough because it is only now that you've had the common fucking courtesy to reply to me*.
I'm sure you would rather I kept quiet (not that two tags in this thread could be considered "at every opportunity"), but the fact that it is only now that you've piped-up rather demonstrates the necessity of mentioning you again.
You're all very fired-up and strident this morning, trying to portray my behaviour as disproportionate and unreasonable and dismiss yours as "just one of those things": perhaps that's why you've forgotten to apologise?
I gave you ample opportunity to deal with this "in private", which you roundly ignored (to acknowledge that you "didn't respond the first time", but not the second, third or fourth times is deceitful).
So if you don't like people calling you a cunt, then perhaps you should...
*A whining PM bemoaning your appearance in this thread, but neither explaining nor apologising, sent after a "long lunch" doesn't count.
-
• #3978
From my original response to your original pm about the matter:
"My bad for not telling you - honestly thought you would be more pissed at my laziness than anything so yes I did chose to lie. Apologies as I did not realise the effect it would have on your work and waiting about. Poor form."
Not sure which part of this is me not apologising? Let me say it again - I am sorry. Also don't see how this is me not having the courtesy to reply?
Again, apologies.
-
• #3979
telling lies about posting something is not in the spirit of the forum.
This.
But also this:
@Scilly.Suffolk keeps baiting me by tagging me. Seems pretty over the top.
It's getting a bit boring / weird now.
-
• #3980
Guys, it's not yet Friday. Can we hold off on the popcorn for a day so everyone can come to play?
-
• #3981
People fuck up and should be given second chances without being vilified at every opportunity
-
• #3982
do you even lfgss?
-
• #3983
Sweet Jesus - are the forum filth at it again?
-
• #3984
That's the first time I've seen that:
"I raised my complaints with croft via PM on Sunday afternoon: he hasn't replied despite posting on the forum, so he can exercise his right to reply here."When did you send it?
Obviously after I had posted the above, at which time I would have deleted our PM: by this time it had been a week since you had last replied to a PM.
Have another look at your PM and you'll see that you were corresponding with no-one: there is no recipient.
apologies
Thank you.
-
• #3985
It's getting a bit boring / weird now.
Mentioned twice in three months: that's excessive?
-
• #3986
People fuck up and should be given second chances without being vilified at every opportunity
Agreed.
But not without at least apologising.
And to say that Croft has been vilified at every opportunity is utter rubbish.
-
• #3987
When did you send it?
A few days after. Guess it may have been after you posted here. Can screenshot and send to you if you don't believe me. Anyways.
Again, I am sorry. I fucked up, fully accept it. My second chance begins..... now.
-
• #3988
but you lied...........only joking, doesn't seem like that big a deal to me
-
• #3989
-
• #3991
Has this been resolved yet?
-
• #3992
Oh, that was the guy selling this peach, https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/281688/#comment12795982
Would not trust at all!
-
• #3993
Scilly.Suffolk in reply to @Richard1982
Neither have I.
Keep us posted.
Hello all, sorry I've not been on - been away for a few days.
Received a refund from James so all's well that ends well :-) -
• #3994
Case closed then...
-
• #3995
Have you been repaid yet?
-
• #3996
He had the money to shell out on C'dale track 93...and I hear it was a fair few bob....like a lot fair few bob
-
• #3997
[cough] ^ & ^^ [cough]
-
• #3998
@dancing james @Mancini if you guys have a brain cell between you, put it to action and have a read of the comments before yours!
-
• #3999
Thats time I don't have.
-
• #4000
I sent you the rims+brake calipers, I know it takes long :S. I was to busy on my job on December because of the Christmas :S
I hope you are enjoying them now.
Repost!