Puerile sexist shite

(wary of any arguments that suggest teh pronz is inherently sexist).

Isn't it?

Not if you take the view that it's made to cater for all sexual preferences and genders.

I assume the site contains both boy and girl hamsters. All of which are of age, and consenting.

Ask @Velocio, he's bound to be subscribed to it. I can't for a second imagine @marcom missed this one out.

I don't think that was one of them.

I actually managed to silence nearly all of those subscriptions. It's good owning your own email gateway, rather than add them to the Spam folder you can hard bounce them.

Nearly all?

Which did you keep?

Hard bounce a porn email? Sounds fun.

Not sure porn is inherently sexist either, I've researched quite a lot to try and figure it out. Some porn does have issues around this sort of thing though and sponsoring a sport, especially one that has its own issues seems a bit odd.
I also couldn't think of anywhere else to put it.
#notaeuph

None, those are just the email servers that don't care about the bounces and will continue to spam. Those do end in the spam folder.

Giggly humor aside.

I actually agree with you.

Amazing.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/06/the-feminist-cupcake-sale-that-led-us-into-the-darkest-depths-of-gender-inequality

Wow.

'bake sale'?

also: some people are lower than worm shit.

Never read the comments.

Fuck.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards.

to campuses in the UK only giving students the proportion of a cupcake they would earn in real life.

The death, from starvation, of thousands of History of Art and Social Anthropology students are on their heads.

#maximumfedora

This isn't trolling. Trolling is rhetoric epistemology calculated to magnify the dissonance between thesis and antithesis, for the purpose of catalysing a more meaningful synthesis of discordant ideas. These morons are giving trolls a bad name.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/apr/25/nicole-cooke-cycling-sexism-jess-varnish-shane-sutton

The response from BC .. facepalm

There is not a palm big enough for that face. Or something like that. That response though - quibbling over numbers instead of addressing any of her strongly worded key points - is shocking.

burns BC license

Reading Pendleton and Cooke's book, I'm not surprise in the very least.

amey
pezcyclingnews.com/

"Daily Distractions" wtf!?

pezcyclingnews.com/media/?tag­list=dd-media&id=172955#.VrtTNJOLTxs

The Daily Distractions photo gallery celebrates the beautiful women of cycling and the women we love, because nothing brings a smile like the sight of a pretty lady - at a race, on the street, and even on your desktop. Send us a photo & a few words of your favorite lady and if we can use and we'll send you both some PEZ Socks by DeFeet. • Photo Tip: No helmets & No glasses. • File sizes should be 500kb - 1mb. • Include your sock size & address. • Email photos to Content@PezCyclingNews.com • Read BABE SHOTS 101: Taking The Best Photos • Follow us on Instagram/PezCyclingNews and enjoy the best photos from PEZ anywhere you go.

No helmets?! Aren't they the majority of their target database taking part?

Smallfurry
I assume the site contains both boy and girl hamsters. All of which are of age, and consenting

You're the small furry one...You tell us.

Plz! Addressing a woman as a "lady", clearly demonstrates respek.

"No helmets & No glasses"? Because you can't wank into a (Pez) sock if they're anonymous?