Not that I should be at all surprised by the Daily Mail's complete lack of journalistic ethical standards, but why do they insist on running the Virginia shooting story with a picture of the precise moment the shooter opened fire on that terrified woman?
Not that I should be at all surprised by the Daily Mail's complete lack of journalistic ethical standards, but why do they insist on running the Virginia shooting story with a picture of the precise moment the shooter opened fire on that terrified woman?