You are reading a single comment by @Jimmy_Fingers and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
As far as I have read, there's nothing particularly suspicious about the data?
One bit I read is that the power jumped up massively (~600W to ~1000W) with seemingly no increase in HR. But, as @andyp says, both the power or HR data could easily be modified to make it say anything you like.
Certainly the power output is innocuous, 388 watts, 5.9w/kg (not that I understand those numbers, just that is within acceptable parameters).
Assuming that's FTP then 5.9W/kg puts him, unsurprisingly, in the "World Class" bracket:-
http://d4nuk0dd6nrma.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/powerprofiling.jpg
Greenbank
@Jimmy_Fingers
As far as I have read, there's nothing particularly suspicious about the data? Certainly the power output is innocuous, 388 watts, 5.9w/kg (not that I understand those numbers, just that is within acceptable parameters).