So it is. Great minds think alike. Even if mine hasn't got the hang of reading all the way to the end of a post yet.
Of course, the paper only deals with radial stiffness and not lateral stiffness, and while lateral stiffness is undoubtedly A Good Thing, it's debatable whether radial stiffness is. If you had a wheel which was laterally stiff and radially relatively unstiff then you'd have the utopia of all frame designers combining the hallowed lateral stiffness and vertical compliance.
This paper suggests (Fig. 6 for example) that spoke diameter (and so spoke stiffness) has a significant impact on lateral stiffness, which in my view is more important than radial stiffness anyway.
So it is. Great minds think alike. Even if mine hasn't got the hang of reading all the way to the end of a post yet.
Of course, the paper only deals with radial stiffness and not lateral stiffness, and while lateral stiffness is undoubtedly A Good Thing, it's debatable whether radial stiffness is. If you had a wheel which was laterally stiff and radially relatively unstiff then you'd have the utopia of all frame designers combining the hallowed lateral stiffness and vertical compliance.
This paper suggests (Fig. 6 for example) that spoke diameter (and so spoke stiffness) has a significant impact on lateral stiffness, which in my view is more important than radial stiffness anyway.