-
• #16702
Fashion is very subjective though and the trend for very large watches is already on the wane. If you intend to keep it for a few years then don't worry. Ultimately if it brings you pleasure that's all that really matters.
-
• #16703
I've tried on a 36mm Datejust, which looks just right on, and a 34mm Date, which looks a tad small but has a marginally cleaner dial. I think I quite like the idea of a slightly smaller watch, especially as it's a (bling bling) Rolex, but I wonder if I've convinced myself of that because I want the better dial.
34mm Date (with my other watch for scale):
36mm Datejust:
Thanks you guys.
-
• #16704
The Air-King-Date, my original crush, was 34mm by the way.
-
• #16705
As was the original Explorer 1 before they went and fucked it up.
-
• #16706
Explorer 1 is megapr0n...
-
• #16707
I'd still go a long way for a 1655.
-
• #16708
1016 or GTF0...
-
• #16709
Any interest in this Steinhart Ocean Vintage Military? It's a few months old, box, papers, dangly thing, spare links etc and of course the majority of a two year warranty:
Direct from Steinhart it'll cost you ~£295 (that's what I paid), so £250 including the rather fetching NATO strap it's on in the picture? It's on the steel bracelet currently (and the spare links are of course included).
-
• #16710
@StandardPractice - personally I prefer the 34mm offering than the DateJust. It just looks too big.
-
• #16711
Nice...
-
• #16712
http://www.fellows.co.uk/The-Watch-Sale/2015-06-30
May be of interest to some.
-
• #16713
You guys will I'm sure be thrilled to know I've taken some on-wrist photos of the two (almost identical) watches than I'm agonising in my choice between:
34mm Date
36mm Datejust
If it were a possibility I'd probably choose the dial from the Date and the overall size of the Datejust, though does anyone else agree that the proportions of the Date are just a bit better overall?
Thanks in advance for your comments or opinions.
-
• #16714
Can't beat the classic 34mm proportions IMO.
-
• #16715
after one day, you won't tell the difference. go with the one you like the most.
-
• #16716
Can't beat the classic 34mm proportions IMO.
agreed
-
• #16717
.
-
• #16718
34mm date looks nicer. Just a tiny bit small though...
-
• #16719
10mm to small
-
• #16720
might as well be a yard to small
-
• #16721
34mm
The roman numerals on the datejust are awful.
-
• #16722
I'd love to have a clear gut feeling but I don't.
-
• #16723
Noted.
-
• #16724
Any interest in my Steinhart before the Bay of Thieves?
-
• #16725
@StandardPractice
flip a coin and your gut reaction to the result will help you decide
I suspect you'll never be certain unless you try it on, as (in my opinion, anyway) the lug-to-lug is only one part of how the watch looks - case design can make a watch look larger or smaller than the measurement alone would suggest.